The two tests clearly illustrate that the conventional seat cushion allows the user to sit through the cushion because it does not have the function to adequately support, or disperse, weight effectively. This is illustrated in map 1 highlighting a large proporation of the buttocks, which is the area at greatest risk. In fact the pressure being exerted has approached the maximum level within the test criteria. Of equal importance are the tall thin peaks, highlighting an extreme localised intensity of pressure. This is more likely to be associated with the cause of tissue breakdown. Sustained pressure at this level will become intolerable especially for those without the ability to allieviate the discomfort for themselves, this is also a contributory factor in the development of pressure related ailments.

In complete contrast, the Reflexion seat cushion shows a substantial reduction in interface pressure around the critical area of the buttocks and is completely devoid of any pressure contact areas. The peaks are shallower and have gentle gradients indicating that the weight is not localised and has been distributed much more evenly.

All foams are classified according to performance; therefore class becomes the measure of performance and durability. Each separate composite of a Reflexion seat conforms to BS3379 class "V", intended for use in very severe applications. Many cushions in this sector are not ... BEWARE OF IMITATIONS.

Clinical assessments were conducted by Tissue Viability Consultancy Services Ltd.

Ergonomics

Ergonomics in the workplace has become increasingly prominent in the last decade with employers beginning to understand the many benefits of ergonomically designed products. It is the key ingredient to a healthier, safer and happier workforce.

In 2002 the British Contract Furniture Association launched an approved product award which was given to only 4 products for excellence in design practice and product performance. Reflexion seating was awarded one of the four awards.